Monday, July 19, 2010
January 20, 1953: Snoopy and Schroeder
I think this is the first strip with just the two of them. Later on there are some memorable strips that pair the two that I, um, don't remember at this minute. Heh.
How large is Snoopy in the last panel? The more I look at it, the more he seems to be huge! We know the kids have to reach up to reach the door handle, and as this strip shows Snoopy is still pretty small relative to them. But sitting down in the last panel, his head come up most of the way to the door! Am I just seeing things?
Sunday, July 18, 2010
Saturday, July 17, 2010
January 18, 1953: Linus' security ball
Linus demonstrates that he might have some security issues. He's so happy in the second panel!
Just because I thought was funny, the Peanuts strip up at comics.com today was this one from 1963:
It's nice to see Schulz, even at the height of Peanuts' popularity, not taking the strip all that seriously.
Friday, July 16, 2010
January 15, 1953: Modern Snowman Art
This is another of those posts that Blogger shuffled off to the Drafts folder without telling me:
Another snowman strip. Peanuts is becoming a bit more topical. But more interesting than that is the way Charlie Brown is drawn in side-view, especially in the third panel, which is closer to the classic (as opposed to early) Peanuts look than ever before. When viewed from the front it's less obvious, since his eyes are still pretty far apart from that angle.
Another snowman strip. Peanuts is becoming a bit more topical. But more interesting than that is the way Charlie Brown is drawn in side-view, especially in the third panel, which is closer to the classic (as opposed to early) Peanuts look than ever before. When viewed from the front it's less obvious, since his eyes are still pretty far apart from that angle.
Labels:
art,
charliebrown,
modernart,
snowman,
trite
January 17, 1953: The unnamed expression
We already did this one, on December 20, 1952:
A strip I passed up, from December 30, 1952:
Another strip I passed up, from January 8, 1953:
Now today's strip:
I think we need a name for that expression Charlie Brown has in the first strip, second panel, and Linus, Lucy and Charlie Brown wear in the last panel of the other strips. It definitely isn't a full "smile." "Smirk" doesn't work because it implies derisiveness. I guess it's a kind of grimace, but
It's a rueful expression. Schulz uses it when a character's plans haven't worked out as he or she wants, or he suffers some reverse. It's not an angry expression, and it doesn't seem to represent straight frustration. One could almost always tie the word "sigh" to it, which hasn't been used an awful lot so far.
I think it needs to be named because it's going to crop up again and again. And ideas?
A strip I passed up, from December 30, 1952:
Another strip I passed up, from January 8, 1953:
Now today's strip:
I think we need a name for that expression Charlie Brown has in the first strip, second panel, and Linus, Lucy and Charlie Brown wear in the last panel of the other strips. It definitely isn't a full "smile." "Smirk" doesn't work because it implies derisiveness. I guess it's a kind of grimace, but
It's a rueful expression. Schulz uses it when a character's plans haven't worked out as he or she wants, or he suffers some reverse. It's not an angry expression, and it doesn't seem to represent straight frustration. One could almost always tie the word "sigh" to it, which hasn't been used an awful lot so far.
I think it needs to be named because it's going to crop up again and again. And ideas?
Labels:
charliebrown,
expression,
grimace,
linus,
lucy,
smile,
smirk
Thursday, July 15, 2010
January 13, 1953: Schroeder has standards
This is a rather funny strip; the turnabout in the last panel is pretty sharp. Again, for this one to work you have to know about Schroeder's music snobbery, which isn't information you can glean from this strip by itself. Of course now we all know about Schroeder and his peccadilloes, but Peanuts wasn't in a huge number of papers in those days.
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
January 9 & 10, 1953: Onceuponatimetherewerethreebears...
Not to pile on the Calvin and Hobbes comparisons, but I seem to remember Calvin's Dad doing the same thing to get through a loathed reading of Hamster Huey and the Gooey Kablooie.
Lucy's response here demonstrates her developing personality; she is becoming less reluctant to express displeasure.
Another story-reading strip makes a Schroeder & Beethoven joke without actually showing Schroeder. A strip like this doesn't work unless the reader brings into it knowledge from other strips, a type of gag that doesn't work unless the characters have strongly defined personalities. (Or, in Schroeder's case, a strongly-defined personality quirk.)
Labels:
beethoven,
charliebrown,
lucy,
reading,
sarcasm,
schroeder,
story,
storytelling,
thanksfornothing
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
January 7, 1953: That's kind of harsh
Say what you want about Calvin, but at least he never got expelled from school. What must have Lucy done?
Labels:
charliebrown,
expelled,
lucy,
nurseryschool,
shame
January 6, 1953: Stadium boots?
Labels:
charliebrown,
clump,
klomp,
patty,
shermy,
stadiumboots,
violet
Friday, July 9, 2010
January 5, 1953: Bread an budder, bread an budder...
This strip serves two purposes. It sets up the premise that Lucy absolutely must, for whatever reason, have her sandwiches with the crusts cut off. And it continues to establish her fussiness, which has been alluded to before when her mother called her a "fussbudget" but hasn't yet been seen far beyond the ordinary. Both will be referred to in future strips.
Labels:
breadanbudder,
charliebrown,
crusts,
fussiness,
lucy,
sandwiches
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)